[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
Gary Sullivan
garysull windows.microsoft.com
Fri Apr 1 11:59:32 ESTEDT 2005
MG Li et al,
No, it means all macroblocks are frame macroblocks.
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
________________________________
From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org] On Behalf Of Li.Mg [???]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2024 1:27 AM
To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
Subject: [Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
Dear experts,
I'm also confused about the case of MacroBlock to Slice group of 8.2.2.8 in ITU-T H.264 (2003/05) version.
8.2.2.8:
"Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified by:
MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) * PicWidthInMbs
+ ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ]"
when parameter : frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
equal to 0 --> it means this is a coded frame with all the MacroBlocks are field MarcoBlocks ?
BR,
MG Li
________________________________
[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
Gary Sullivan garysull windows.microsoft.com <mailto:mp4-tech%40lists.mpegif.org?Subject=%5BMp4-tech%5D%20about%20H.264/AVC%20standard%20document&In-Reply-To=>
Mon Jan 24 09:24:36 ESTEDT 2005
* Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html>
* Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, MPEG2, and MPEG1 <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html>
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766> [ thread ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766> [ subject ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766> [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>
________________________________
With field_pic_flag equal to 0 and mb-aff turned off, I think you're talking about an ordinary frame.
BTW you should get ahold of something more recent than G050r1. That's from several iterations ago.
-G.
________________________________
From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> ] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2024 3:01 AM
To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech>
Subject: [Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
hello,experts:
In h.264/AVC standard document(JVT-G050r1,Page 86) there is a paragraph about FMO decoding:
"Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified by:
MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) * PicWidthInMbs + ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ] (8-27)"
who can tell me what's the picture type(frame or field or others) if "frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0"?
thanks!
ronggang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050124/5856f54f/attachment.html
________________________________
* Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html>
* Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, MPEG2, and MPEG1 <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html>
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766> [ thread ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766> [ subject ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766> [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>
________________________________
More information about the Mp4-tech mailing list <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050401/554cbccf/attachment.html
More information about the Mp4-tech
mailing list