[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document

Gary Sullivan garysull windows.microsoft.com
Fri Apr 1 11:59:32 ESTEDT 2005


MG Li et al,
No, it means all macroblocks are frame macroblocks.
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
________________________________
	From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org] On Behalf Of Li.Mg [???]
	Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2024 1:27 AM
	To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
	Subject: [Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
	Dear experts, 
	    I'm also confused about the case of MacroBlock to Slice group of 8.2.2.8 in ITU-T H.264 (2003/05) version.
	    8.2.2.8:
	    "Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
	     equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified by:
	    MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) * PicWidthInMbs
	    + ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ]"
	    when parameter : frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
	     equal to 0 --> it means this is a coded frame with all the MacroBlocks are field MarcoBlocks ?
	BR,
	MG Li
________________________________
	[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
	Gary Sullivan garysull windows.microsoft.com <mailto:mp4-tech%40lists.mpegif.org?Subject=%5BMp4-tech%5D%20about%20H.264/AVC%20standard%20document&In-Reply-To=> 
	Mon Jan 24 09:24:36 ESTEDT 2005 
	*	Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html> 
	*	Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, MPEG2, and MPEG1 <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html> 
	*	Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766>  [ thread ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766>  [ subject ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766>  [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>  
________________________________
	With field_pic_flag equal to 0 and mb-aff turned off, I think you're talking about an ordinary frame.
	BTW you should get ahold of something more recent than G050r1.  That's from several iterations ago.
	-G.
	________________________________
		From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech>  [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> ] On Behalf Of ???
		Sent: Monday, January 24, 2024 3:01 AM
		To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> 
		Subject: [Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
		hello,experts:
		     In h.264/AVC standard document(JVT-G050r1,Page 86) there is a paragraph about FMO decoding:
		    "Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal     to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified     by:
		    MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) *         PicWidthInMbs + ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ]                  (8-27)"
		     who can tell me what's the picture type(frame or field or others) if "frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0"?
		     thanks!
		     ronggang
	-------------- next part --------------
	An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
	URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050124/5856f54f/attachment.html
________________________________
	*	Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html> 
	*	Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, MPEG2, and MPEG1 <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html> 
	*	Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766>  [ thread ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766>  [ subject ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766>  [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>  
________________________________
	More information about the Mp4-tech mailing list <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050401/554cbccf/attachment.html


More information about the Mp4-tech mailing list