[M4IF Discuss] On2 and IPR
Iain Richardson (ensigr)
i.g.richardson rgu.ac.uk
Thu Mar 21 08:55:30 EST 2002
I had a look at the source code for On2's VP3 codec : at a first glance
it seems to be similar to MP4 Simple Profile, i.e. based on DCT with
half-pixel motion estimation, 4 MVs per macroblock, etc. Given that we
are told that Simple Profile is covered by the MP4 patent pool, I would
think that the VP3 may also be open to patent claims. Any comments ?
At 13:28 +0100 3/18/02, AVARO Olivier FTRD/DIH/REN wrote:
>Hi Dave, all,
>
> > They also seem to feel that there are no alternatives, but this is
>> not the case. On2's statements may be clumsy and mistaken, but they
>> are at liberty to offer, for example, more acceptable licensing
terms
>> to industry consortia who simply replace the MPEG-4 video codec with
>> theirs. There are other vendors in a similar position. There are
>> also other standards -- the H.26x series obviously springs to mind.
>
>On2 is not capable of guaranteing that their codec is IPR free and
>IPR exist on the H.26L baseline. These "solutions" are therefore
>confronted with the same pb. as MPEG-4. On2 is amalgaming Open
>Source and Royalty free solutions to get more PR points. H.26L is a
>fair attempt to provide a Royalty free standard but in its current
>shape it is unable to guarantee success.
>
---
Dr Iain E G Richardson
Lecturer and Researcher
School of Engineering, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
Tel +44 1224 262403; Fax +44 1224 262444
i.g.richardson rgu.ac.uk
More information about the Discuss
mailing list